The Hacker's Target
Moderator: Wiz Feinberg
-
b0b
- Posts: 29079
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Cloverdale, CA, USA
The Hacker's Target
Here's an interesting article on hacking into Microsoft:
www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/14344.html
It seems that some of these annoying email worms are actually part of criminal hackers' efforts to gain access for profit.
Never run email attachments. Never. Even if they're from me.
------------------
<img align=left src="http://b0b.com/Averybob.gif" width=64 height=81><small>
</small> -b0b- <small> quasar@b0b.com </small>
-System Administrator
www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/14344.html
It seems that some of these annoying email worms are actually part of criminal hackers' efforts to gain access for profit.
Never run email attachments. Never. Even if they're from me.
------------------
<img align=left src="http://b0b.com/Averybob.gif" width=64 height=81><small>
</small> -b0b- <small> quasar@b0b.com </small>
-System Administrator
-
Jack Stoner
- Posts: 22146
- Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Kansas City, MO
-
Jim Smith
- Posts: 7949
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Midlothian, TX, USA
I got the security updates for Outlook 2000 as part of the Office 2000 service pack. Now I can't figure out how to receive an executable when I want to. I can see that there is an attachment by the paper clip on the message but when I try to save it, it says there are no attachments. Anyone know how to at least selectively turn that off?
-
Jack Stoner
- Posts: 22146
- Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Kansas City, MO
Jim, once the security update is installed, it's bascially all over. They have categories for different files and the .exe is in the category that can't be modified.
I know, it sucks as they don't give you any option on certain types of files. Microsoft was taking a lot of heat for the security holes and it looks like they over reacted. It will protect the dummies, but it puts a crimp in legitimate operations.
My suggestion would be to have Outlook Express also installed and if you knew someone was going to send you an .exe, use the outlook express to receive the message.
I know, it sucks as they don't give you any option on certain types of files. Microsoft was taking a lot of heat for the security holes and it looks like they over reacted. It will protect the dummies, but it puts a crimp in legitimate operations.
My suggestion would be to have Outlook Express also installed and if you knew someone was going to send you an .exe, use the outlook express to receive the message.
-
Jeff Agnew
- Posts: 741
- Joined: 18 Sep 1998 12:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Sorry, but instead of trying to stay ahead of the myriad Outlook/OE security holes, why not get a security-aware e-mail client?
Both Poco and The Bat are shareware apps without the most glaring holes in MS products, are smaller, offer more useful features, and ship with more secure default settings. Let's face it, not many folks stay current with MS patches and rarely change from default configurations.
Also, users would be wise to remove Windows Scripting Host from their systems, disable *all* ActiveX, enable display of all file extensions, and never, ever, use HTML in e-mail.
Both Poco and The Bat are shareware apps without the most glaring holes in MS products, are smaller, offer more useful features, and ship with more secure default settings. Let's face it, not many folks stay current with MS patches and rarely change from default configurations.
Also, users would be wise to remove Windows Scripting Host from their systems, disable *all* ActiveX, enable display of all file extensions, and never, ever, use HTML in e-mail.